model parameter and hyperparameter
Model Parameters and Hyperparameters in Machine Learning -- What is the difference?
For example, suppose you want to build a simple linear regression model using an m-dimensional training data set. If the model uses the gradient descent algorithm to minimize the objective function in order to determine the weights w_0, w_1, w_2, …,w_m, then we can have an optimizer such as GradientDescent(eta, n_iter). Here eta (learning rate) and n_iter (number of iterations) are the hyperparameters that would have to be adjusted in order to obtain the best values for the model parameters w_0, w_1, w_2, …,w_m. For more information about this, see the following example: Machine Learning: Python Linear Regression Estimator Using Gradient Descent. Here, n_iter is the number of iterations, eta0 is the learning rate, and random_state is the seed of the pseudo random number generator to use when shuffling the data.
Model Parameters and Hyperparameters in Machine Learning -- What is the difference? - WebSystemer.no
For example, suppose you want to build a simple linear regression model using an m-dimensional training data set. If the model uses the gradient descent algorithm to minimize the objective function in order to determine the weights w_0, w_1, w_2, …,w_m, then we can have an optimizer such as GradientDescent(eta, n_iter). Here eta (learning rate) and n_iter (number of iterations) are the hyperparameters that would have to be adjusted in order to obtain the best values for the model parameters w_0, w_1, w_2, …,w_m. For more information about this, see the following example: Machine Learning: Python Linear Regression Estimator Using Gradient Descent. Here, n_iter is the number of iterations, eta0 is the learning rate, and eed of the pseudo random number generator to use when shuffling the data.
Probabilistic Latent Tensor Factorization Model for Link Pattern Prediction in Multi-relational Networks
Gao, Sheng, Denoyer, Ludovic, Gallinari, Patrick
This paper aims at the problem of link pattern prediction in collections of objects connected by multiple relation types, where each type may play a distinct role. While common link analysis models are limited to single-type link prediction, we attempt here to capture the correlations among different relation types and reveal the impact of various relation types on performance quality. For that, we define the overall relations between object pairs as a \textit{link pattern} which consists in interaction pattern and connection structure in the network, and then use tensor formalization to jointly model and predict the link patterns, which we refer to as \textit{Link Pattern Prediction} (LPP) problem. To address the issue, we propose a Probabilistic Latent Tensor Factorization (PLTF) model by introducing another latent factor for multiple relation types and furnish the Hierarchical Bayesian treatment of the proposed probabilistic model to avoid overfitting for solving the LPP problem. To learn the proposed model we develop an efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling method. Extensive experiments are conducted on several real world datasets and demonstrate significant improvements over several existing state-of-the-art methods.
- Africa > Senegal > Kolda Region > Kolda (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- Europe > France > Île-de-France > Paris > Paris (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.48)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.48)